Will's Sports Blog

South Florida Sports From Local10.com

FIU botches Wittels situation

Posted by willmanso on February 16, 2011

On Wednesday afternoon, FIU star baseball player Garrett Wittels is scheduled to meet with the media about the upcoming season and his current 56 game hitting streak.  It should be a feel good story about a local kid on the brink of making college baseball history.  Of course, that’s the not the case because of one simple fact. Wittels was arrested in the Bahamas late last year and charged with raping a 17-year-old girl.  His father denies the charge, and as it should be, he’s innocent until proven guilty.  Yet, FIU is turning what is already an uncomfortable situation into a sideshow.

The athletic department has threatened to end the news conference immediately if any questions about the rape case are asked to Wittels.  They’re also saying that season credentials could be pulled for the organization that asks a case related question.  Needless to say, this is a joke.  This isn’t even about Wittels anymore.  I don’t know him personally, but I have talked to some people who do know him quite well.  All indications are that he is a good kid, and he comes from a good family.  I’m told by those close to him that he had a lapse in judgement that night, but that he didn’t commit any crimes.  All of that is to be determined by the law.  It’s not in my place to bring the kid down without all the facts of the case coming out.  Again, he is innocent until proven guilty.

The real issue I have is with FIU’s threats and insistence to make this more difficult than it needs to be.  Last season, while Wittels was on his amazing streak, FIU couldn’t have enough coverage.  They made him available and loved all the attention he brought to the school.  It became a national story, and it helped make FIU a nightly mention on the local news.  It’s always nice when things are going well.  Of course, now that Wittels has put himself in a bad spot, the school is rewriting the rules and being difficult with the media.  Well, guess what?  You can’t have it both ways.  My job, as well as all my media colleagues, is to ask the pertinent questions about a story.  No matter how amazing his streak is, the story right now is the rape arrest.  It’s Wittels right to not answer the questions or to not give specifics about the case.  He can say as much or as little as he wants.  I’m sure his lawyers have made clear to him what subjects can be discussed.  It would be beyond silly to think you can hold a newss conference without someone asking a question about the case.  Simply put, FIU is handling this situation very poorly.

I know this can’t be an easy position for FIU to be put in.  They are an institution of higher learning, above all things.  Some have criticized the school for not suspending Wittels.  In my mind, unless they have information that points to him being guilty, he should be given the benefit of the doubt and let the legal process play out.  Instead, what might play out on Wednesday is a farce, and FIU should be ashamed of that.  It’s not a lesson they should be teaching Wittels or any other student at the school.


2 Responses to “FIU botches Wittels situation”

  1. Mike Jarman said

    Uh…excuse me a minute. While I’m glad you believe in the
    presumption of innocence, and I certainly appreciate that you are
    willing to allow Mr. Whittles to exercise his right not to speak on
    the subject (again, very noble), perhaps even further introspection
    is in order for you and your “media colleagues.” Two words: Duke
    Lacrosse. You and your “media colleagues” might consider that
    matter an aberration, but I can assure you every university
    administration took notice of what happened there and adjusted
    their behavior accordingly. Your “media colleagues” took a dubious
    allegation, conflated it with the civil rights and women’s rights
    movements, and turned it into a multi-million dollar lawsuit fro
    Duke. You all walked away unscathed, because constitutional malice
    is a nice shield. Perhaps even the police and the city of Durham
    will also walk away, because governmental immunity is also a nice
    shield. FIU doesn’t have the luxury of shooting rubber bands from
    parapets. There is no protection for university speech. So, if you
    admit Whittles doesn’t have to say anything, and FIU won’t say
    anything (if the institution knows what’s good for it), all you’re
    whining about is the in ability to throw questions out into thin
    air that you know will be unanswered. Where does that get you and
    your “media colleagues”? Oh yea, it gets you the ability to charge
    FIU with “stonewalling” the press, or being “insensitive to rape
    victims”, or any other groundless charge that one can (unfairly
    IMHO) infer from simple silence – without violating Sullivan v.
    NYT, of course. Since you wan’t learn from your mistakes, maybe
    it’s time you were taught. FIU, as you admit, is primarily an
    institution of higher learning. Are you and your “media colleagues”
    capable of learning?

  2. willmanso said

    The only thing FIU doesn’t seem to be teaching is the 1st
    amendment. I can’t really comment on the Duke lacrosse case because
    I didn’t cover it. As for throwing questions into the air, isn’t
    that what we do as journalists everyday in our jobs? Sometimes we
    get real answers and sometimes we don’t. It doesn’t mean we can’t
    ask. Unless you’re FIU, of course. Thanks for writing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: